Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRuget, Vanessaen_US
dc.contributor.authorScanlan, William
dc.creatorScanlan, Williamen_US
dc.date2021-11-24T14:05:39.000en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T11:34:18Z
dc.date.available2021-11-29T11:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01en_US
dc.date.submitted2021-08-31T11:13:14-07:00en_US
dc.identifierhonors_theses/336en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13013/819en_US
dc.description.abstractIn a world where electoral reforms are frequently discussed, numerous countries have resorted to mandating citizen participation in elections. This electoral approach – commonly termed compulsory voting – has been adopted by democratic and authoritarian regimes alike. The majority of research on compulsory voting acknowledges that it successfully increases voter turnout. Other factors including the presence and severity of sanctions for abstention have been analyzed, but the existing literature fails to consider multiple components of compulsory voting. This research strives to bridge that gap through the use of preliminary data, a literature review of existing work, and case studies of Brazil and Belgium as it seeks to address the effectiveness of compulsory voting today. By considering various elements of past and present systems simultaneously, this research finds that compulsory voting is only as effective as a country’s political, social and economic configurations allow. If implemented correctly, compulsory voting is effective in increasing voter turnout and has the potential to create more representative election results.en_US
dc.titleThe Effectiveness of Compulsory Voting: Evidence from Brazil, Belgium, and Beyonden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.legacy.pubstatuspublisheden_US
dc.description.departmentPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.date.displayMay 2021en_US
dc.type.degreeBachelor of Science (BS)en_US
dc.legacy.pubtitleHonors Thesesen_US
dc.legacy.identifierhttps://digitalcommons.salemstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=honors_theses&unstamped=1en_US
dc.legacy.identifieritemhttps://digitalcommons.salemstate.edu/honors_theses/336en_US
dc.subject.keywordcompulsory votingen_US
dc.subject.keyworddemocratic processen_US
dc.subject.keywordelection systemsen_US
dc.subject.keywordvoter turnouten_US
dc.subject.keywordvoting reformen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Scanlan__20William_20Thesis.pdf
Size:
448.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record