Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMulcare, Danen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnonymous
dc.creatorAnonymous
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T18:37:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-09T18:37:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13013/2640
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses three methods of reform to the United States criminal justice system. It discusses mandatory minimum sentences, sentencing disparities, racial bias, drug courts, and the Defund the Police movement, analyzes the issues and benefits associated with each of these areas, and specifies the disproportionate impact many of the system’s flaws have had on people of color and poor communities. It argues that a combination of adjustments relative to mandatory minimum sentences, drug courts, and the Defund the Police movement would provide the best outcome for improving many of the issues within the system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleRevising Mandatory Minimums, Defund The Police, Or Drug Courts: How Best To Reform The United States Criminal Justice Systemen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.departmentPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.date.displayMay 2022en_US
dc.type.degreeBachelor of Science (BS)en_US
dc.subject.keywordmandatory minimum sentencesen_US
dc.subject.keywordDefund the Policeen_US
dc.subject.keyworddrug courtsen_US
dc.subject.keywordraceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsocial worken_US
dc.subject.keywordmental healthen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
anonymous thesis redacted.pdf
Size:
241.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
anonymous thesis.pdf
Size:
250.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record